Our network
The expert network
We maintain a network of AI experts available for litigation support, expert reports, and technical analysis focusing on methodological rigor.
Request an expertA structured expert network
Traditional expert witness directories often operate as open platforms where individuals register independently. This can result in variable candidate backgrounds, requiring attorneys to conduct independent vetting. We maintain direct professional relationships.
Our network connects attorneys with AI researchers, practitioners, and forensic specialists considered for technical rigor, methodological clarity, and professional background. Experts in our network are evaluated against core considerations for technical litigation support.
When you submit a matter inquiry, we review potential candidates matching the technical aspects of your case. This process supports attorney evaluation while respecting the scope of technical analysis versus legal conclusions.
Expertise areas
Machine learning and deep learning
Model architecture, training methodology, validation, and output reliability analysis.
Natural language processing
Large language models, text generation, classification, and NLP system evaluation.
Computer vision and synthetic media
Image and video analysis, artifact detection, and synthetic media analysis.
AI fairness and algorithmic bias
Disparate impact analysis, validation critique, and bias evaluation methodology.
Digital forensics and evidence
Chain of custody, forensic artifact analysis, and technical forensic tool evaluation.
AI systems engineering
System architecture, software reliability, failure analysis, and performance evaluation.
Government and defense AI
Procurement, compliance, and technical evaluation of AI systems in public sector contexts.
AI safety and risk assessment
Risk modeling, safety testing methodology, and evaluation of AI system safeguards.
Expert evaluation standards
Experts in our network are considered against the following criteria, reflecting key focus areas for technical litigation support.
Technical depth
Demonstrated technical experience in specific AI domains. Evaluation considers publications, practical project work, and technical background.
Methodological transparency
Use of documented and reproducible methods. Evaluation considers whether analytical approaches are clear, methodologically transparent, and suitable for assisting courts with technical assessments.
Source verification
Commitment to verification of sources and citations in technical work product. Consideration is given to verifiable methodology supporting reliable technical analysis.
Communication ability
Ability to explain complex AI concepts clearly to non-technical audiences. Consideration includes prior presentation experience and technical communication clarity.
Availability and scheduling
Consideration of expert availability relative to litigation timeframes and scheduling needs.
Join the expert network
If you are an AI researcher, practitioner, or forensic specialist interested in expert witness and litigation support work, we welcome inquiries. We look for practitioners with specialized technical expertise, analytical rigor, and a commitment to methodologically sound technical analysis.
Apply to join the networkGet started
Start with the technical question
Begin a non-confidential matter triage to identify the technical issue, litigation posture, and expert profile that may fit the matter.